Surly doesn’t win trials!

I’ve known some very nice people. I’ve also known some rather surly characters. Some of the nice ones were (and are) successful. Some not so successful. The same thing can be said about the surly types. Donald Trump seems really nice, and he’s also really rich. Steve Jobs, sadly, appears to have been pretty surly when he didn’t like someone’s ideas. He was also really rich. So, if wealth is what you want, you can get it being nice or surly.

But I’ve discovered something over my years as a prosecutor and defense attorney. Jurors don’t like surly. They adore nice.

This week I am in the midst of another jury-trial heavy phase of my law practice. I’ve had 10 jury trials in the last twelve months. That’s more than you’d imagine. Most lawyers are lucky (or cursed, depending on their attitudes…surly?) to be in jury trial once every three months, so this has been a remarkably litigious year for my clients and me. I had a trial two weeks ago…NOT GUILTY! And another this week…NOT GUILTY! (Both were DUI trials, by the way.) I have another coming up the middle of December (I’m prosecuting for a municipality then, so will be going for a guilty verdict!). These last two trials taught me something very valuable. As I said above, Jurors don’t like surly.

Here’s what happened. In the first trial the deputy was surly from the get go (the incident was recorded on video). I can’t share details due to attorney-client privilege, but let’s just say that nature called and the deputy put the call on hold, even though there were clear extenuating circumstances that should have compelled him to be nice and allow the defendant to avoid embarrassment. In fact, shoot forward two weeks, and that’s exactly what the nice deputy did for the other defendant. After that first trial’s NOT GUILTY verdict, the prosecutor and I talked to the jurors. They unanimously did not appreciate the attitude (meanness/surliness) of the deputy. Fortunately for the defendant, not only was he mean in the field, but he had a really cocky, know-it-all attitude on the witness stand. The defendant, on the other hand, took the stand and was very humble and nice, and talked and walked as well then as the night of his arrest. Still, it was clear that had the deputy been nicer the outcome might have been different.

I’m happy he was surly.

Now for this week’s trial. That deputy was courteous and nice to the defendant on the night of her arrest (it was recorded on video, too). There were other circumstances there that I believe compelled the jury to find her NOT GUILTY (e.g., the video showed ok though not perfect driving through a construction zone, and she wore 5-inch high heels and didn’t have coordination issues when not performing “unnatural human acts”), but the comments from the jurors were night and day compared to the previous trial. They had nothing negative to say about the latter deputy’s attitude. They did think that what he saw on the video was different than what they saw (credibility?), but didn’t focus on him being a jerk like the other trial.

They thought the first deputy was a jerk. The second was “just doing his job.”

As my grandmother put it, “you can catch more flies with honey than vinegar.” So true. Officers who are courteous and polite with defendants and jurors tend to be more persuasive during jury deliberations even though they never enter the jury room.

By the way, I’ve adopted a combative attitude with witnesses in the past. This accomplishes two things. One, it puts the witness on the defense and he will likely weasel his way around the question. Two, it makes jurors hate me, which is not good for the client. Nice is a much better examination style. Nice attorneys get more helpful answers and endear themselves to juries (or at least don’t tick them off!). Hence, “what’s good for the goose (witness) is good for the gander (attorney).” If I’d been perceived as a jerk in these trials it would have likely cancelled out the officers’ surliness and the clients might have lost.

So there it is. Average, everyday people (including engineers, teachers, counselors, salesmen) prefer nice. If they prefer nice, so should we. So let’s be nice. It’s a really good time of year to adopt such an attitude.

If you find yourself in need of representation in a domestic, criminal, traffic, estate planning, or business matter, call me at 316-262-2331. Two NOT GUILTY verdicts in a row! I’m on a roll and would love to help you, too.

Copyright © 2012 Kevin Mark Smith

No news is good news

Sometimes law can be boring, which is a good thing. Sure, the newspaper reports a murder here, a traffic fatality there, but in general, if the news is absent of reports on ground shaking, precedent setting cases, life is good. Which begs the question, why do lawmakers feel compelled to make stupid laws in the first place? Is it about dealing with things that are dire and in need of addressing, or a desire to shake things up and put their mugs in front of the cameras so constituents feel like their votes amount to something? Just enforce the ones you already have. Case in point: cell phones and texting while driving.

First, let me be clear, TEXTING while driving is stupid and should be expressly against the law. It pulls the drivers’ eyes off the road and probably causes more accidents in any given year than drunk driving. Sure, the latter are often much more dire and even deadly, but drunk driving and SMS driving are equivalently distracting. But lately, some cities and states are going off the deep end by banning all cellular telephones from drivers, even hands free units. Stupid. Busy body lawmaking.

I heard last week that Chapel Hill, South Carolina, just passed one such ordinance. It bans all cellular telephones, headset or not. The absurdity of it was the mayor’s statement that it isn’t about issuing citations and collecting fines. It is about sending a message. Huh? A strategically placed billboard or two would “send a message.” This law will just make it more difficult to take that important call from a family member in need of help, or client who’s money is burning a hole in his pocket.

Who voted for these people? Whoever did obviously doesn’t need a cell phone to do business, which probably means they are professors at one of those high brow universities in Chapel Hill. The people paying their salaries are probably pretty ticked right now.

Why do I call these lawmakers busy bodies? Simple. Every city I know of already has laws on the books banning “careless” or “inattentive” driving. Whether you’re chomping on a Big Mac, putting on mascara, or using a cell phone, you could easily be prosecuted under these types of laws if your stupidity leads to an accident. Hence, these bozos are just trying to get their day in the limelight. Stop it! You’re there for us, not yourself! Leave us alone and do something worthwhile for a change.

Travails of a defense attorney

I don’t blog much about actual trial or practice experiences. Too much risk of divulging attonrey-client privilege. But every so often the crap I have to deal with compels me to rant a little. This is one of those rants.

How hard is it really to live responsibly? It’s not nuclear science, right? Marry the woman you will have children with. Don’t make the babies first. Also, if you are going to make babies sans marriage, do so with one woman or man, not multiple ones. Perhaps most important, if you do screw around and have kids, don’t be surprised when the mother or father sues for custody or child support.

And another thing. Don’t drive a car unless you have insurance and a valid license. Don’t ever drive after drinking alcohol. Don’t take stuff that isn’t yours. Don’t beat your spouse or children. Etc.

I could go on, and on, and on. People today have no common sense. Church is good for that, but who wants to feel bad about what they are doing when that thing is clearly immoral and wrong?

Here’s the good news. If you don’t refrain from the above and get into trouble, I can probably get you out of it. I’ve got a pretty good record at doing just that. I’d just prefer that the next legal matter I help you with is something fun like an adoption, will, or business incorporation.

Rant is over. Have a good day.

Today’s articles of interest. Click on link for details.

Wage and hour lawsuits on the rise

Lesson to learn: ask potential lawyer what he does to keep cases from falling between the cracks.

How long is too long for a traffic stop?

Texas Planned Parenthood director arrested for indecent exposure.

Abortion activist waives jury trial and goes with judge. Big mistake.

Funny but true courtroom story

I was in traffic court two weeks ago when a funny thing happened. A Mexican pro se defendant came into the DA’s traffic room with an interpreter. With the interpreter lurking to the side, the prosecutor asked the defendant (in English) what he wanted to do with his case. In perfect English with a slight Hispanic accent, he replied, “I’m trying to get my citizenship so I can get my license.”

The interpreter paused a second then turned toward the prosecutor. Using his hands for emphasis, he said, accent free, “He’s trying to get his citizenship so he can get a license.”