NRA ‘disappointed’ after Biden meeting
Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he will deliver his recommendations on reducing gun violence to President Barack Obama by Tuesday, perhaps including universal background checks for purchases and forbidding certain types of high-capacity magazines.

NRA accuses White House of ‘attack’ on 2nd Amendment rights
The National Rifle Association said Thursday it was “disappointed” by its meeting Thursday with Vice President Biden, accusing the Obama administration of using the time to “attack the Second Amendment.”

Statement From the National Rifle Association of America Regarding Today’s White House Task Force Meeting
Fairfax, Va. – The National Rifle Association of America is made up of over 4 million moms and dads, daughters and sons, who are involved in the national conversation about how to prevent a tragedy like Newtown from ever happening again.  We attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to kee

Biden says Obama could use executive orders to restrict guns
Vice President Joe Biden said on Wednesday the White House plans to act quickly to curb gun violence and will explore all avenues – including executive orders that would not require the approval of Congress.

Prosecutor to look into TV incident
The decision on whether anyone should be prosecuted after “Meet the Press” host David Gregory appeared to hold a high capacity ammunition magazine on national television now belongs to the District’s Office of the Attorney General, authorities said Tuesday.

New York: More gun control sought by Gov. Cuomo
Mr. Cuomo is a possible 2016 presidential contender who is seeking to elevate his stature among Democrats base nationally, after a much praised victory on same sex marriage in his first year in office. His push for enhanced gun control even drew praise from Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York, in

New Jersey: Bill would require psych tests for all applicants for firearm permits
Individuals seeking a permit to buy firearms in New Jersey would have to submit results of a psychological evaluation before they could buy a gun, under a bill introduced yesterday in the Legislature by West New York Assemblywoman Angelica Jimenez.

NYT Editorial: “Sneaky Apps That Track Cellphones”
NYT Editorial: Sneaky Apps That Track Cellphones: A perversion of smartphone technology called “stalking apps” — precise, secretive trackings of the movements of cellphone users — is increasingly a matter of national concern, particularly for domestic abuse victims. No less threatening is the routi

Sen. Feinstein suggests national “buyback” of guns

CA6 is troubled by 3 weeks of constant video surveillance of backyard under Jones but finds it harmless
The Sixth Circuit is troubled by three weeks of constant video surveillance of defendant’s backyard by a pole camera in light of Jones and its trespass holdings. “We are inclined to agree with the Fifth Circuit that ‘[t]his type of surveillance provokes an immediate negative visceral reaction.’” Nev

TN: DNA profile in John Doe arrest warrant was particular for Fourth Amendment and tolled SOL
A woman lawyer was the target of a home invasion at aggravated attempted rape in 1994 in Nashville. She struggled with the assailant who beat her head, and she bit off a piece of skin on his finger, spitting it under the bed. He left. In 2000, a DNA profile was run on the piece of the finger, and th

E.D.Pa.: Even disregarding a misleading paragraph in the SW application there was still PC
Officers conducted a protective sweep and saw ammunition in plain view. They also had enough to seek a search warrant, and they did, including the reference to the ammunition. There was a misleading paragraph in the affidavit. Excising it and the reference to the ammunition, there was still probable

E.D.Pa.: Car subject to search for PC could be moved before the search for safety purposes
The search of defendant’s car was justified by the automobile exception with probable caues or the search incident doctrine although the car was moved before the search to the police station. Defendant was stopped on a street, and a crowd had begun to form. It was within the officers’ discretion to

Asa Hutchinson on CNN’s State of the Union
Asa Hutchinson on CNN’s State of the Union - December 23, 2012

CA6: Fourth Amendment does not require question about DL before asking about drugs
There is no constitutional requirement that the officer ask for DL before asking about drugs. Defendant here was found to have consented to a search of his vehicle. United States v. Cochrane, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25980, 2012 FED App. 0416P (6th Cir. December 20, 2012)*: To the extent that Defendant

OR: State can’t rely on standing on appeal if it doesn’t raise it at suppression hearing
The state could not rely on lack of standing to support admission of the product of the search where it did not raise it at the suppressing hearing. State v. Jepson, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1525 (December 19, 2012).* Defendant was on probation and in custody, and his consent was not coerced even thoug

N.D.Ala.: Defendant volunteered consent before he was asked
In the dashcam video, defendant consented to a search of his vehicle without even being asked, and it was voluntary. United States v. McGowan, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177630 (N.D. Ala. October 30, 2012).* The stop of the vehicle was with probable cause, and the officer developed reasonable suspicion

D.S.C.: Under Randolph the police can wait for defendant to leave and ask a joint occupant for consent
Defendant was not prejudiced by defense counsel’s failure to move to suppress his girlfriend’s written consent. He was removed from the premises on arrest, and the police had no duty under Randolph to seek consent from him. United States v. Swain, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177193 (D. S.C. December 14, 2

D.D.C.: Jones on remand: no suppression of GPS because good faith exception applies
Antoine Jones won his landmark case holding GPS tracking requires a warrant, but he loses on remand to the good faith exception. United States v. Jones, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177294 (D. D.C. December 14, 2012): Defendant, with the support of an amici curiae brief filed by Electronic Frontier Founda

D.Kan.: Uncorroborated tip for school strip search doesn’t overcome qualified immunity; it’s plaintiff’s burden
An uncorroborated tip led to a strip search of a female student in school. Nothing was found, and the student was threatened with trouble if she talked about it. The question is close, but the court finds that plaintiff did not show sufficient precedent that an uncorroborated tip is not enough for a

IL: Officer’s own testimony didn’t support that defendant was evading
There was no indication from the officer’s testimony that defendant saw the police car and continued to drive, was attempting to evade the police, or otherwise acted in a furtive manner. Therefore, the motion to suppress should have been granted. People v. Petty, 2012 Ill. App. LEXIS 1004, 2012 IL A

D.Neb.: Search of defendant’s car for officer safety was too intense, a de facto search incident, and unreasonble
The search of defendant’s car was not based on officer safety; it was a de facto search incident without probable cause under the guise of officer safety, and the motion to suppress is granted. A search of a closed container was unreasonable. United States v. Morgan, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175192 (D.

OH9: Acquittal on basis for stop doesn’t mean motion to suppress stop would have been granted
Defendant was acquitted of a weaving offense, but convicted of DUI for driving on the wrong side of the road. Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress the stop because the acquittal of the weaving charge doesn’t mean anything on the DUI and the basis for the stop. State v. Arno

Matt Taibbi: Too Big To Prosecute? “Outrageous HSBC Settlement Proves the Drug War is a Joke”
Rolling Stone: Outrageous HSBC Settlement Proves the Drug War is a Joke by Matt Taibbi: If you’ve ever been arrested on a drug charge, if you’ve ever spent even a day in jail for having a stem of marijuana in your pocket or “drug paraphernalia” in your gym bag, Assistant Attorney General and longti

PA: Defendant’s front driveway not protected curtilage where his damaged car was parked and anyone could walk up
The police did not violate curtilage by walking up to defendant’s car parked in his front driveway that had been damaged in a hit-and-run, was missing a bumper, and had its airbags deployed. Commonwealth v. Simmen, 2012 PA Super 268, 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4084 (December 11, 2012). Defendant had no

N.D.Ala.: Police entry 22 minutes before SW issued was reasonable because of exigent circumstances
A warrant was being sought, and the officers waiting for the warrant reasonably figured that their cover had been blown and it was time to secure the premises before the warrant arrived. The seizure of the house and protective sweep 22 minutes before the warrant arrived wasn’t unreasonable. United S

E.D.Tenn.: Defendant fails to show part of affidavit false; even it if was, it was immaterial
The USMJ granted a Franks hearing and concluded that the statements were not materially false and removing them still left probable cause. Therefore, no suppression. United States v. Houston, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175955 (E.D. Tenn. November 21, 2012)*, R&R 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176812 (E.D. Ten

IL: No exigency for warrantless entry after controlled delivery
Police were delivering marijuana to defendant’s house. They planned it for 11 hours, and they had no exigent circumstances. Worse, they never even argued exigent circumstances. People v. Krinitsky, 2012 Ill. App. LEXIS 998, 2012 IL App (1st) 120016 (December 11, 2012)*: [**P30] In this case, the

CA3: Anders brief rejected; the Fourth Amendment claim here is at least arguable and must be discussed more fully
Anders brief rejected; the Fourth Amendment claim here is at least arguable and must be discussed more fully. The court won’t reject it out of hand. United States v. Telfair, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25376 (3d Cir. December 12, 2012)*: In addition, the importance of the evidence seized from 185 Parker

D.Minn.: Nexus for a suspect’s home is based on “common sense” appeal of the inference evidence may be found there
Nexus for a suspect’s home is based on “common sense” appeal of the inference evidence may be found there after a crime elsewhere. United States v. Morris, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175977 (D. Minn. December 12, 2012): Morris argues that there was insufficient evidence of a nexus between Morris’s home

CA11: The way cash is packaged can add to probable cause
Probable cause existed for seizure of money from a car by the way it was bundled and packaged, among other things. Legitimate businesses do not transport their cash in cardboard boxes. United States v. Julian, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25356 (11th Cir. December 12, 2012)*: In determining whether probabl

OH: An individual subject to an arrest warrant does not forfeit all expectations of privacy from illegal arrest
An individual subject to an arrest warrant does not forfeit all expectations of privacy from illegal arrest. State v. Gardner, 2012 Ohio 5683, 2012 Ohio LEXIS 3089 (December 6, 2012): [*P1] In this appeal, we consider whether an individual who is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant forfei

CA4: Where there’s PC, officers telling the defendant they believed he had child pornography on his computer was exigency to seize it
Telling a person that he’s the target of a child pornography investigation creates exigency to seize his work computer so he won’t destroy what’s on it. Here, the officers told defendant they had probable cause against him. United States v. Brown, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25012 (4th Cir. December 6, 201

DE: Criminal impersonation arrest during traffic stop supports SI
Defendant was arrested for criminal impersonation for giving false name, address, and DOB to officer during a traffic stop, and that supported his search incident. Stafford v. State, 2012 Del. LEXIS 622 (December 4, 2012). Validity of consent issue is not one normally appealable by the state in Ark

MI: Defendant’s revocation of his consent did not make the officers’ presence unlawful
Defendant’s revocation of his consent did not make the officers’ presence unlawful for purposes of his resisting arrest prosecution. People v. Kodlowski, 2012 Mich. App. LEXIS 2440 (December 4, 2012).* There was [apparently] probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest and the impoundment of his car, so h

E.D.N.C.: Defendant staying at friend’s house on house arrest had no REP in their storage room
Defendant was staying at a house on house arrest, and he did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy as to its storage room to which he had a key. He did not have exclusive access to it, and others came and went. United States v. Gardner, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171927 (E.D. N.C. August 9, 2012).

D.S.D.: Wrong house number on SW was a correctable error where right house was searched
The wrong number for the address of defendant’s place (“34” not “32”) was not a constitutional error. The correct color was shown, and the officers made certain that they entered the correct house when they got there by rechecking with other sources. United States v. Running Shield, 2012 U.S. Dist.

Kansas: Topeka City Council Repeals Ban on Loaded Handguns in Vehicles
On Tuesday, the Topeka City Council voted unanimously to overturn its outdated prohibition against carrying loaded handguns in your vehicle.  In a 10-0 vote, Mayor Bill Bunten and nine city council members furthered Kansas’ strong tradition of Second Amendment support by bringing the Topeka in line

BATFE Taking Comments on “Sporting Purposes” Exemption to “Armor Piercing Ammunition” Law Until Dec. 31
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is taking public comments on its website until December 31, with regard to how it should determine what types of projectiles meet the “sporting purposes” exception to the federal “armor piercing ammunition” law. At this time, the question cente

Anti-Hunters Want You Labeled as a Domestic Terrorist
Being an integral part of America’s remarkable wildlife restoration success story is, at times, a thankless job, but having some animal “rights” fanatics petition the White House to label us as “domestic terrorists” for our efforts is something new altogether.  These anti-hunting zealots state that

Outrage of the Week: Sports Columnist Likens NRA to KKK
Sportscaster Bob Costas’ misplaced anti-gun rant during the halftime of NBC’s broadcast ofSunday Night Football has received considerable media coverage and has been roundly criticized for interjecting politics into a what should be an entertainment program (please see related story above). Much le

Bob Costas Uses Half-Time “Commentary” to Bash American Gun Owners
As most of you know, NBC sportscaster Bob Costas has deservedly come under fire for his latest “sports commentary,” offered up to unsuspecting viewers on  this week’s “Sunday Night Football” half-time segment.   Blaming the tragic murder-suicide committed by Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belch

SSRN: “To Be Secure: The Forgotten Words of the Fourth Amendment”
SSRN: To Be Secure: The Forgotten Words of the Fourth Amendment by Luke M. Milligan: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..

N.D.Iowa: Dog sniff at apartment door validly supported search warrant
A drug dog alerted at defendant’s apartment door, and this supported a search warrant. The court declines to follow Jardines v. Florida, 73 So.3d 34 (Fla. 2011), cert. granted, 132 S. Ct. 995 (2012), despite the fact it was argued a month earlier [and would thus come down any day now], instead follo

CA6: Clearly erroneous explained again
Crediting the officers’ testimony that defendant consented to a patdown that produced a sawed-off shotgun was not clearly erroneous. United States v. Oldham, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24686, 2012 FED App. 01227N (6th Cir. November 28, 2012). Clearly erroneous explained: The district court did not commit

FL2: Search of school bookbag without reasonable suspicion of anything
The juvenile had an early meeting with her school counselor, and, after the meeting, she had to leave her bookbag because of a school rule against bookbags in the hallway. Four times during the day she came and asked for access to the bookbag which was denied. Based on that, the counselor decided to

Ohio Plain Dealer: “Keep DNA evidence private”
Ohio Plain Dealer: Keep DNA evidence private by Jonathan Witmer-Rich and Brendan Heil: On Nov. 1, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a startling — and unnecessary — opinion eroding DNA privacy for Ohio citizens. The court held that the Fourth Amendment does not protect an individual’s personal DNA pro

CA9: Govt failed to prove exigency for warrantless entry
The box delivered to defendant had a beeper inside that was supposed to emit a continuous tone when it was opened. It malfunctioned and continued to emit a continuous tone before it left police custody. There were no exigent circumstances justifying a warrantless entry into defendant’s dwelling to s

CA7: Govt failed to prove exigency; its theory was speculative
Government failed to prove its theory of protective sweep. It’s argument essentially put the burden on the defendant to prove that the protective sweep was unjustified, and that’s wrong. Also, the government’s waiver of an opportunity to put on additional proof of exigency before the Magistrate Judg

MD: Suppression judges act like appellate judges and shouldn’t second guess PC
A suppression hearing judge sits like an appellate judge in determining the adequacy of the showing of probable cause. The suppression judge improperly second guessed the probable cause here, and the suppression order is reversed. State v. Johnson, 2012 Md. App. LEXIS 146 (November 30, 2012) (Moylan

GA: Arrest for obstruction didn’t support SI under Gant
Defendant was arrested for obstruction, and the search of his truck after he was handcuffed was invalid under Gant. Hargis v. State, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 1028 (November 29, 2012). The court credits the officers’ testimony that defendant spontaneously admitted to having a gun on him after a brief enc

D.D.C.: SW for robbery proceeds not stale just because a wily robber might dispose of the proceeds
Defendant’s claim that the AUSA’s signature on warrant papers is constitutionally meaningless even if it was true. Similarly, the fact the affidavit was signed on one day before one judge and the warrant issued on another day before another judge does mean anything. The information about a robbery i

CA2: Motorcycle checkpoint shown justified by special needs
A motorcycle checkpoint program in New York State was shown to be justified by special needs. Wagner v. Sprague, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 24542 (2d Cir. November 29, 2012) [but this is a memorandum opinion with no facts]. The government justified a protective sweep of defendant’s house by showing his h

OR: Automobile exception only applies to vehicles, not the occupants
The automobile exception applies to vehicles, not their occupants, and the state confesses error based on United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 586-87 (1948). State v. Freeman, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1356 (November 7, 2012). Defendant was seized by being ordered by loudspeaker to come out of the hous

MD: Violation of state SCA not subject to exclusion for lack of standing in provider information
The state violated the Maryland Stored Communications Act, similar to the federal Stored Communications Act, in obtaining cell phone provider created information about his account by a state subpoena served out of state. He has no reasonable expectation of privacy in that information, so the evidenc

W.D.Wash.: Franks reckless disregard shown
Franks “reckless disregard” was shown in a wiretapping case. Here, the issue was the government’s claim they could not use additional GPS devices in exhausting other investigative techniques, and then actually did after that. United States v. Hamilton, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169290 (W.D. Wash. Novemb

D.Ariz.: Use of a pole camera for surveillance from off property not a violation of REP
Surveillance of comings and goings to defendant’s apartment with a pole camera does not constitute a “trespass” under Jones. United States v. Brooks, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168738 (D. Ariz. November 28, 2012): Additionally, as argued by the Government, despite a block wall that could potentially act

Gun Owners Enter the Fight of Our Lives
The NRA has been saying all along that Barack Obama would unleash an assault on our Second Amendment freedoms if he won a second term. It sure didn’t take long for him to prove us right.

Illinois: Federal Court Upholds Right to Keep and Bear Arms and Awards the NRA $125,000 in Attorney’s Fees
On September 26, 2012 the United States District Court in the Northern District of Illinois awarded the National Rifle Association (NRA) $125,000 to reimburse it for attorney’s fees spent winning a lawsuit against the City of Chicago over a Chicago firearm ordinance on behalf of NRA member Shawn Gow

M.D.Ala.: Way cash was packaged supported reasonable cause it was possessed for acquiring drugs
Claimant admitted smoking marijuana two hours before his traffic stop as an explanation for the smell of marijuana in the car. He admitting having cash, but when it was found there was more than he admitted and it was packaged strangely. That was reasonable suspicion of use of the money for drug acq

OH2: Not being on the rental car paperwork and not knowing renter was RS
The officer had reasonable suspicion to continue the stop where defendant and his passenger were in a brand new rental car, neither was on the paperwork, and they didn’t know the name of the renter. State v. Jalloh, 2012 Ohio 5314, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 4636 (2d Dist. November 16, 2012). Because dig

NY: Defense needs to seek the inventory policy rather than just complain testimony was vague
The officer did not produce the inventory policy and testified vaguely to it. Since the defense did not ask for it, the court can’t say the inventory was unconstitutional. The inventory itself will not be micro-managed by the courts. “The inventory here, while not a model, was sufficient to meet the

Washington: “No Shooting” Ordinance to be Considered in Island County Tomorrow
Tomorrow,November 21, at 2:15 p.m., the Island County Board of Commissioners will hold awork session at which they will discuss an unnecessary “no shooting” ordinance. Commissioner Angie Homola, who lost her bid for re-election, is pushing this measure that would facilitate the imposition of shootin

Virginia: Page County Board of Supervisors to Defy State Law and Consider Restrictive Noise Ordinance
Today, November 20 at 7:00 pm., the Page County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing to consider a proposed noise ordinance which would amend the current law, Chapter 81, Noise, in its entirety. The proposed prohibitions contain an exemption for formal or informal sport shooting, but woul

D.S.C.: Getting out of vehicle and pushing bag under car was considered abandonment
Defendant got out of a vehicle with a bag and set it down on the ground. He pushed it under the vehicle, but not far. The court concludes that the bag was abandoned by this action. United States v. Davis, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162396 (D. S.C. November 14, 2012): Two possible inferences can be drawn

Why The Glass-Steagall Myth Persists [Forbes.com]
The definitive history of the financial crisis remains to be written. But one thing is for sure: it shouldn’t be written by those who have a quasi-religious conviction that the freedom to pursue profits is the cause of all the world’s problems, and that government regulation is the unfailing el

Ohio: Comprehensive Pro-Gun Reform Legislation Remains Stalled
Election season has concluded and Ohioans are fortunate to have elected and re-elected numerous pro-gun candidates who will lead the state in protecting our Second Amendment rights during the 2013-2014 legislative session.  However, our legislative agenda for this year is not complete. House Bill 49

OH2: Smell of burning marijuana and seeing some during knock and talk justified entry
Officer doing a knock and talk smelled burning marijuana coming from the house, and he could see marijuana on the coffee table. His entry to preserve the evidence was reasonable since the defendant knew that the officers knew it was there. State v. Miller, 2012 Ohio 5206, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 4558 (

OH2: Validity of judge’s appointment can’t be challenged by attacking search warrant
The alleged defective appointment of a judge to replace one who died cannot be attacked in a criminal proceeding challenging a search warrant the judge issued. The general rule is that the legality of the judge’s appointment must be tested in quo warranto and not by collateral attack in a criminal p

WA: Gant applies to all pending cases
Gant is retroactive under the Washington Constitution and applies to all nonfinal cases. State v. Louthan, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 745 (October 25, 2012). Defendant’s postconviction claim of unsworn affidavits for search warrant is shown to be false. Johnson v. State, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2276 (November 8, 201

D.Neb.: Merely talking to a parked motorist was not a seizure
Officers talking to a motorist parked in a Lexus in a high crime area to watch out was not a seizure. The officer walked around the car and saw the butt of a gun, but it turned out to be a BB gun. United States v. Mahr, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161000 (D. Neb. October 22, 2012): Taking the “position t

GA: Cell provider’s voluntarily relinquishing records in a recent double homicide was no ground to suppress
Georgia law limits access to cell phone records, and a double murderer was at large and the police were tying desperately to locate him. There is a statutory suppression remedy, but the telephone company turned them over voluntarily when asked by the police, in good faith. This obviated the suppress

D.Mont.: Defendant had standing in a mailed package even though the return address wasn’t his
Defendant had standing to challenge the search of a mailed package even though the return address was not his name. United States v. Gardenier, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160030 (D. Mont. November 7, 2012): The parties do not dispute that Gardenier sent the package, even though the return label read “Je

Illinois: Cook County Commission Changed Date of Budget Hearing and Today Approved a Punitive Tax on your Second Amendment Rights
Today, the Cook County Board of Commissioners held a Special Board Meeting and approved the misguided and onerous tax on firearms purchased in Cook County (previously reported on here).   This procedural move put the vote a week earlier than scheduled, as it was supposed to take place next week on N

SCOTUS grants cert in Maryland DNA case
The Supreme Court granted cert in Maryland v. King today. Chief Justice Roberts had previously granted Maryland a stay pending decision on cert. Issue: Whether the Fourth Amendment allows the states to collect and analyze DNA from people arrested and charged with serious crimes.

Grassroots Alert: Vol. 19, No. 45 11/09/2012

Obama Administration Endorses New U.N. Arms Trade Treaty Negotiations
Just as NRA warned would happen, following the election, the Obama administration has moved forward with its plans to support a United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. On Wednesday November 7, the U.S. Mission to the U.N. made clear its support for renewed ATT negotiations, casting a vote in favor of reso

Contact Your U.S. Senators and Urge Their Support of S. 3525, the “Sportsmen’s Act of 2012″
When Congress reconvenes on November 13, one of the first items the U.S. Senate could vote on is S. 3525, “The Sportsmen’s Act of 2012.”  S. 3525 is an essential piece of legislation focused on the expansion and enhancement of hunting, recreational fishing and shooting on federal public land.

No Longer Camouflaging Their Agenda, Anti-Gunners Start Gun Ban Plans
Any attempt by the anti-gun elite to hide their agenda has officially gone by the wayside.  Recent electoral history had taught the gun control crowd to camouflage their intentions during the campaign season, and then wait for an opportune time to act.  That tactic now appears to have run its course

A Special Debt of Gratitude
In this week’s alert, we observe two important days in our nation.  Election Day always reinforces how lucky we are to live in a country where “we the people” can choose our elected leaders and have a voice in how we are governed.

2012 Election Recap
The dust is still settling from Tuesday’s voting, but one thing is clear:  NRA-ILA’s 2012 election effort was one of the most sophisticated and targeted endeavors in our history.  Though President Obama was able to secure a second term, pro-gun voters did turn out to the polls in significant numbers

NJ: While cell phone records were inproperly obtained, that did not lead to the discovery of the victim’s body, so it should not have been suppressed
Defendant’s cell phone records were improperly obtained by a flawed process, but the inevitable discovery doctrine supported the finding of the victim’s body after the finding of the murder weapon, so the body would not be suppressed. State v. Smith, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1065 (October 25, 2012): We turn

GA: Officer’s discovery seatbelt was buckled did not constitutionally mandate ending stop
Defendant was stopped for a seatbelt violation, but the officer found that the seatbelt was tucked under the arm and was legal. The stop being initially lawful, the officer was not obligated to end the stop and let the defendant go immediately. Davis v. State, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 872 (October 23, 20

CO: A pat down solely for officer safety was unreasonable
A pat down solely for officer safety was unreasonable. People v. Berdahl, 2012 COA 179, 2012 Colo. App. LEXIS 1734 (October 25, 2012): [*P27] Nevertheless, the trial court appears to have applied a bright-line rule that an officer can conduct a pat-down search whenever he or she has an obligation

New book: The Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment’s Exclusionary Rule by Tracey Maclin
Boston U. press release: “A celebration of the publication of The Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment’s Exclusionary Rule by Tracey Maclin, Professor of Law,” Monday, October 29, 2012: Boston University School of Law is delighted to celebrate the publication of The Supreme Court and the Fourth A

Grits for Breakfast: “Houston hearing honed in on use of drones by law enforcement”
Grits for Breakfast: Houston hearing honed in on use of drones by law enforcement: Grits wishes I could have attended yesterday’s hearing in Houston of the US House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Crime on domestic use of unmanned drones by law enforcement, but James Pinkerton at the Houston

Grassroots Alert: Vol. 19, No. 43 10/26/2012

The NRA is deeply disappointed in Thursday’s ruling by the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which upheld the federal law that bans dealer sales of handguns to law-abiding adults between the ages of 18 and 20.

With “Supporters” Like This, What Amendment Needs Enemies?
Yesterday, in a New York Daily News commentary, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) paraphrased President Obama’s most insincere campaign talking point with a direct quote from Brady Campaign propaganda, saying “You can support the Second Amendment” by imposing “common sense” gun control laws. In particu

Whistleblower Sues Time, Inc. Over “Fast and Furious”
We reported recently that a key “Fast and Furious” whistleblower, John Dodson had called on Fortune Magazine to retract a story on the scandal that the Department of Justice Inspector General’s report showed to be full of inaccuracies.

With Just 11 Days Until Election Day, Make Sure You’re “All In!”
In 11 days we will go to the polls in what will almost surely be the most important election of our lifetimes.  We all know that a second term for President Barack Obama would threaten the rights of gun owners in numerous, far-reaching ways.  In last Tuesday’s presidential debate, President Obama sa

With Election Day Looming, Gun Controllers State Their “Case”
There are only 11 days remaining before this year’s elections and gun control supporters haven’t had a novel idea since we can’t remember when, so longtime gun control advocates Dan Webster, Jon Vernick and Steve Teret of the (New York City Mayor Michael) Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns H

CA7: Strip search of jail employee was reasonable when search of his person and car came up empty and they had reason to believe he would smuggle drugs into the jail
A jailer was reasonable subjected to a strip search at work based on credible reports he would be bringing cannabis into the jail. His car was stopped and it and his person would be searched. Since drugs weren’t found in those searches, reasonable suspicion thus existed for an employee strip search.

N.D.W.Va.: Defendant did not consent to what officer was doing without asking by defendant merely not speaking
Defendant neither did nor said anything that qualified as consent. Implied consent from his failure to object when the officer was doing something anyway was not consent. United States v. Harvey, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153511 (N.D. W.Va. October 25, 2012), R&R 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153474 (N.D. W

SeattlePI.com: “Irate crowd greets Seattle Police drone plan”
SeattlePI.com: Irate crowd greets Seattle Police drone plan / Aircraft with cameras get harsh reaction in Central District by Casey McNerthney: Seattle police may use remote control drones during future investigations, and a crowd that gathered Thursday night in the Central District was furious abo

CA2: Violation of state jurisdictional law not Fourth Amendment issue
Violation of state jurisdictional law and federal policy re customs officers and state law was irrelevant under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Wilson, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22212 (2d Cir. October 25, 2012): The district court concluded that the vehicle stop violated the Fourth Amendment bec

Volokh.com: “Magistrate Judge Denies Court Order Application for Cell Tower Dumps”
Volokh.com: Magistrate Judge Denies Court Order Application for Cell Tower Dumps by Orin Kerr: The decision is In re U.S. ex rel. Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 2703(d), 2012 WL 4717778 (S.D. Tex. September 26, 2012) (Owlsey, M.J),, and it rejects an application under the Stored Communications

OH12: Informant communicating with cop during drug transaction with defendant was RS
Reliable informant who was communicating with defendant about drugs provided reasonable suspicion. State v. Dennis, 2012 Ohio 4877, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 4278 (12th Dist. October 22, 2012).* Driving too slow and not staying in one’s lane justified a stop. State v. Roetzel, 2012 Ohio 4898, 2012 Ohio

computerworld.com: “Fighting unconstitutional stingray phone surveillance that tracks innocent people”
computerworld.com: Fighting unconstitutional stingray phone surveillance that tracks innocent people by Darlene Storm: Let’s say you have your cell phone with you, even if you are not talking or texting, otherwise minding your own business, innocent of being suspected of any crime … but hey your

Law Offices of Kevin M. Smith, P.A.